Are we really ready to teach with new media?

At my university, we have something called ’learning platforms’. In our case, they are called Cambro and Moodle and their main use is for communication between students and teachers in courses and programmes. I am sure most universities today use things like these. They are inventions that result from the idea that computer-mediated communication and — in later years — social media may be of economic as well as pedagogic benefit for education institutions. They help when organizing distance courses, and adds an extra dimension to campus courses.

That the learning platforms are aimed to gain from the affordances of computer-mediated communication and social media shows in how they are constructed. Commonly used services are chats, blogs, forums, ’e-meeting rooms’, messaging, and audio and/or video hosting. I am the first person to applaud the introduction of such tools in teaching. In themselves — if used in the right ways — they certainly have the potential to add new levels of interactivity, and even creativity, to the drowsy routine of lecture, seminar, lecture, seminar, lecture, seminar.

But however well constructed, well functioning and welcome the learning platforms are, I can’t help but feeling that we could do more, better, or maybe even something else.

When I give talks for politicians who want to know how to use social media most effectively, I tell them to go where the people are. Don’t put your money into designing a static website that very few people will visit. Focus instead of entering a variety of social media flows that are already active. When I give advice to media companies that want to encourage audience participation, I say the same thing: Don’t build your own copy of Facebook. Start a Facebook page! Don’t waste time and energy bringing people to your own gated discussion forum. Go on Twitter! To schoolteachers who want to find ways of working with visual methods in the classrom I say: Go on YouTube! I don’t say this to support Facebook, Twitter or Google (who owns YouTube) as companies. I say it because we can’t benefit fully from social media dynamics by building our own little enclosed systems.

Let’s compare learning platforms with e-mail lists and static Web 1.0 websites. What can we do with learning platforms that we cannot do with these 1990’s tools? Posting the course schedule and study guide is just as easy with the old tools. Electronically handing in papers and assignments is just as easy. Getting a discussion going in the group is just as easy. Reaching everyone quickly is just as easy, etc. But since learning platforms have functions like video, blogs and forums, it seems as if they aim to reach further than this. I think, however, that it is extremely hard — if at all possible — to harvest the fruits of social media while being on a platform that is isolated from the rest of the Internet.

One of the gurus of new media learning, Henry Jenkins, lists some of the abilities that make social media so powerful (read more here):

Collective intelligence. The ability to pool knowledge and compare notes with others.

Transmedia navigation. The ability to follow the flow of stories and information across multiple modalities.

Negotiation. The ability to travel across diverse communities, discerning and respecting multiple perspectives, and grasping and following alternative norms, etc.

Gaining from the power of social media, drawing on literacies like these, obviously demands loosening up the boundaries between the digital presence of the study programme/course and other online social networks. It also requires that students move far beyond the learning platform to meaningfully sample, remix and critically relate to other content that can be incorporated into the learning experience.

But are we really ready to post our lectures on YouTube? Can we start a Facebook group instead of having a course site on a ’learning platform’, live tweet seminars using a course hashtag, or collaboratively collect course resources on Pinterest? What about letting students edit the Wikipedia entry about a theory instead of writing a paper on it?

Please bear with me. I know very little about the Privacy Protection Law (PUL) and other regulations and considerations that play into this. Indeed, social media involves a loss of control and it raises a number of issues regarding openness and even philosophical questions about what a university should be. But if we allow ourselves to be visionary — doesn’t it seem strange to incorporate new media literacies into higher education by way of gated learning communities?

2 Kommentarer
  1. Finn Arne Jørgensen says:

    I couldn’t agree more. Cambro is actually decent as an administrative platform, for handling grading and managing student lists etc, and it’s important that this happens on a secure platform. But I do not find to be a very good pedagogical platform – it tries to do everything, and as a result does not end up doing anything very well. The problem is when we conflate convenient administration with good pedagogy (or research, for that matter). I try to use social media platforms in my courses (currently using Vimeo, Facebook, and WordPress in my history of technology online course), and I see that while these platforms aren’t unproblematic (nothing ever is…) they also add value to the course in ways that Cambro simply doesn’t.

    Svara
  2. Simon Lindgren says:

    Yes Finn Arne, seems we are ready to grade and administrate courses with new media, but not always to teach with it. Combinations like the ones you are describing are good. Most importantly, we must not confuse using learning platforms for administration with using them to further the actual learning.

    Svara

Lämna en kommentar

Lämna ett svar

E-postadressen publiceras inte. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *